QUESTION: What was causing all the excitements on the newspaper articles and what they took as the main reason for conviction was the ’50-Shades of Grey’ costume where Spencer was being insulted and that he forced the lady to wear the cloths and enjoyed it. What do you say about this?
ANSWER: The allegation that Spencer forced his partner to wear a ’50 Shades of Grey’ costume was made at the opening speech of the trial by the prosecution barrister as ‘Opinion-Evidence’. The CPS barrister said to the court that they have no witness evidence against Spencer and that the police case was brought to trial on opinion-evidence. Whether such ‘Opinion-Evidence’ is admissible in British courts in a case such as this is another question the police and the CPS failed to asked themselves, and turned themselves into ‘Morality Police and Morality Prosecutors’.
In witness evidence with the police and at the trial, the lady said that she was not forced to wear the 50-shades of grey costume; that she never cried or in distress during any activity with Spencer; that their relationship and sexual life was entirely consensual; and that it was her idea to watch the ’50-Shades of Grey’ movie and had suggested getting the costume as well.
In Spencer’s evidence to the court, he said that they bought the costume on eBay and it was an Halloween 50 shades of grey theme with a plastic handcuff that requires no key to open and unlock. His partner wore it and tried it on and they took a few selfies of it together laughing and joking and messed around with the costume kissing and cuddling for selfies and two short videos lasting 29-seconds and 68-seconds. This occurred on a single occasion, and that was the end of their curiosity with the 50-shades of grey costume.
In police evidence, Donna Hector presented to the jury the Halloween 50-shades theme selfies of the couple. In respecting the ongoing CCRC process at this stage, we can only go as far as to say that, she re-edited and reduced the duration of one of the videos to hide a very crucial statement evidence that Spencer made in part of the video to the jury. The couple’s voice in the other video was muted and replaced with an unknown child’s voice that appear to be on aesthetics on a dentist surgery making the ‘eeeeiiiiieiiieeeee’ sounding. The lady broke down in tears at how this evil police woman falsified evidence against them in court. The police now claimed to had destroyed these evidence of the couple’s selfies and short videos to prevent it from being presented at the Appeal-court.
Immediately after the jury verdict, the Judge immediately started reading out sentence remarks. It was at that stage that police Donna Hector passed a note to the Judge in open court. The Judge then began to read from that note and all the narratives and more turned up on all the newspapers’ articles in the same way. As we can see, the newspapers’ false narratives of the case was Donna Hector’s pre-planned idea of how she imagined and wanted the case to be publicly told.
Whereas, If the police had done their due diligence on this case to know the sexual personality of Spencer, they would find, as we have found, that on speaking to some of the women he had been in sexual relation with in the past, each and every one of them expressed disbelief and shocked about the conviction narratives. They all confirmed that he had no single shred of kinkiness in him or ever suggested any interest in bondage sex with anyone. One even said that one would try hard to make him try new things he had never done before.
We went to all the areas he had lived and neighbours expressed that he was a very quiet, easy going, and a very respectful man and that when he’s home you’d rarely even know that he was around. This man has never been a club-goer, has never been known to the police as some kind of a ‘bad-boy’ type, has never drank alcohol or ever smoke even. After Donna Hector falsified evidence to the jury and ‘won’ conviction against an innocent man, she immediately populated her lies about Spencer to her friends in the media, and none of them have the gut to challenge us today!
Back to 👇